<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women of the web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fberriman.com/2008/05/23/women-of-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fberriman.com/2008/05/23/women-of-the-web/</link>
	<description>a blog for frances</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: chamelledesigns.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Women web designers?</title>
		<link>http://fberriman.com/2008/05/23/women-of-the-web/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>chamelledesigns.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Women web designers?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fberriman.com/?p=31#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>[...] 3. F Berriman - Women of the web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 3. F Berriman - Women of the web [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caz Mockett</title>
		<link>http://fberriman.com/2008/05/23/women-of-the-web/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Caz Mockett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fberriman.com/?p=31#comment-469</guid>
		<description>Frances raises some very good points... and I agree that the way Sarah goes about things can be seen as making things worse rather than better.

As I woman who has had two careers in very male-dominated environments (electronic engineering and web development), I have to say I've never felt comfortable with the idea of ghetto-ising women. I'm fortunate to always have been treated equally by my peers.

I have attended one Girl Geek Dinner. It started off OK, but fairly quickly degenerated into a "let's bash blokes" whining session. So I left, hoofed it round the corner to Pub Standards (I'm a regular there too) and have never been back since.

I'm with Frances on the side of attending the mainstream Geek events (where I've never felt out of place or belittled) and think that's a much better way of getting more women involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frances raises some very good points&#8230; and I agree that the way Sarah goes about things can be seen as making things worse rather than better.</p>
<p>As I woman who has had two careers in very male-dominated environments (electronic engineering and web development), I have to say I&#8217;ve never felt comfortable with the idea of ghetto-ising women. I&#8217;m fortunate to always have been treated equally by my peers.</p>
<p>I have attended one Girl Geek Dinner. It started off OK, but fairly quickly degenerated into a &#8220;let&#8217;s bash blokes&#8221; whining session. So I left, hoofed it round the corner to Pub Standards (I&#8217;m a regular there too) and have never been back since.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Frances on the side of attending the mainstream Geek events (where I&#8217;ve never felt out of place or belittled) and think that&#8217;s a much better way of getting more women involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simone</title>
		<link>http://fberriman.com/2008/05/23/women-of-the-web/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>simone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fberriman.com/?p=31#comment-450</guid>
		<description>we started the female business magazine for female internet heroes 2 months ago in order to give women who are in the internet industry and who not alle are technical oriented some visibility. check out thenextwomen.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we started the female business magazine for female internet heroes 2 months ago in order to give women who are in the internet industry and who not alle are technical oriented some visibility. check out thenextwomen.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://fberriman.com/2008/05/23/women-of-the-web/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fberriman.com/?p=31#comment-305</guid>
		<description>wow....i just absolutely agreed with every single thing you have written. isn't that a turn up for the books!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow&#8230;.i just absolutely agreed with every single thing you have written. isn&#8217;t that a turn up for the books!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Blackwell</title>
		<link>http://fberriman.com/2008/05/23/women-of-the-web/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Blackwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fberriman.com/?p=31#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute - women who ignore and ostracise 'geeky' guys during their early years and instead date the jocks through high school, then complain when the exact same guys they wouldn't talk to are now returning the favour? ;-)

Ok - I'll admit that is a fairly inflammatory way of putting it, but the sentiment is true: 'Geeky' guys are often the ones who miss out on the early social interaction with girls during their formative years because of prejudice and peer pressure.  Why should it be that guys who now have no social skills when it comes to dealing with women are seen as aloof, sexist, ignorant, etc. when the reality is they're probably just inept at talking to girls?

I'm not making excuses for the sexism or misogyny that I'm sure some of my fellow techies exhibit, nor am I trying to say everybody who works in IT is socially inept.  However, i've seen firsthand how 'geeks' are  treated by their peers and how they're portrayed by the media - is it any wonder that these people grow up with some warped views when it comes to social interaction with women?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute - women who ignore and ostracise &#8216;geeky&#8217; guys during their early years and instead date the jocks through high school, then complain when the exact same guys they wouldn&#8217;t talk to are now returning the favour? ;-)</p>
<p>Ok - I&#8217;ll admit that is a fairly inflammatory way of putting it, but the sentiment is true: &#8216;Geeky&#8217; guys are often the ones who miss out on the early social interaction with girls during their formative years because of prejudice and peer pressure.  Why should it be that guys who now have no social skills when it comes to dealing with women are seen as aloof, sexist, ignorant, etc. when the reality is they&#8217;re probably just inept at talking to girls?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not making excuses for the sexism or misogyny that I&#8217;m sure some of my fellow techies exhibit, nor am I trying to say everybody who works in IT is socially inept.  However, i&#8217;ve seen firsthand how &#8216;geeks&#8217; are  treated by their peers and how they&#8217;re portrayed by the media - is it any wonder that these people grow up with some warped views when it comes to social interaction with women?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Darlow</title>
		<link>http://fberriman.com/2008/05/23/women-of-the-web/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Darlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fberriman.com/?p=31#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Again the fundamental point is being missed here. Trying to improve the working environment for women when that environment is hostile to women is not a bad thing at all; I don't think anybody here is arguing that. However, the *way* that somebody goes about trying to improve that situation is absolutely critical. Sarah's general tone and approach has, if anything, come across as deeply divisive and more likely to perpetuate the gender rift. 

If women in IT want to be treated as equals to their male peers, why would she vilify these same men? Why set up a regular event which shuts men out? This type of behaviour appears designed to draw attention to itself through controversy rather than addressing the underlying issue: that everyone should treat each other alike, and gender should be irrelevant. That is what is destructive.

Also, whilst you have stated that you are a guy, called Andy, your language and tone in your original post are very much from the perspective of a woman; either that or you're exceedingly empathetic; an extremely unusual trait in a developer (usually they're more likely to be practically Aspergian). That being the case, is it any wonder that people muse as to your true identity?

Your comments about web development being non-technical are also hopelessly uninformed; to suggest that this (very deep and still evolving) field is only technical when you're writing something in a programming language is quite simply wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again the fundamental point is being missed here. Trying to improve the working environment for women when that environment is hostile to women is not a bad thing at all; I don&#8217;t think anybody here is arguing that. However, the *way* that somebody goes about trying to improve that situation is absolutely critical. Sarah&#8217;s general tone and approach has, if anything, come across as deeply divisive and more likely to perpetuate the gender rift. </p>
<p>If women in IT want to be treated as equals to their male peers, why would she vilify these same men? Why set up a regular event which shuts men out? This type of behaviour appears designed to draw attention to itself through controversy rather than addressing the underlying issue: that everyone should treat each other alike, and gender should be irrelevant. That is what is destructive.</p>
<p>Also, whilst you have stated that you are a guy, called Andy, your language and tone in your original post are very much from the perspective of a woman; either that or you&#8217;re exceedingly empathetic; an extremely unusual trait in a developer (usually they&#8217;re more likely to be practically Aspergian). That being the case, is it any wonder that people muse as to your true identity?</p>
<p>Your comments about web development being non-technical are also hopelessly uninformed; to suggest that this (very deep and still evolving) field is only technical when you&#8217;re writing something in a programming language is quite simply wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a geek</title>
		<link>http://fberriman.com/2008/05/23/women-of-the-web/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>a geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fberriman.com/?p=31#comment-164</guid>
		<description>My apologies if I've offended you in any way.  If you are in fact female then I'm more shocked than anything that you would find people trying to better the tech environment for other women as destructive.  I guess women work in mysterious ways that I will never understand. 

If you were to better the tech community how would you do it?  I think maybe that's the question that should be put forward.  Like you I disagree with some of what was written in the guardian.  I'm not saying that groups for women are right or wrong, or that there aren't technical women out there.  You see them all over the industry. And as you rightly say you can be technical and work in web dev etc.  And yes I have mis-represented the tech industry a little by assuming all but meaning .net dev.  Thank you for pointing it out.  I won't make the same mistake again! (I think I've been royally told off for that!)

What is it that you see as damaging and what would you want to see that is positive... From what I can see Sarah has been doing something that builds a community where there wasn't one. But maybe I'm missing something since I'm a guy. 

Also have you let her know that you see what she is doing as destructive?  Have you suggested to her what you think she should be conveying to the general public? Maybe a more adult approach should be taken to this and for someone to tell her what is being talked about in the public domain. I don't know her so I don't think it would be my place to bring this forward as I don't know if you even know one another.  But what about it? Forget public arguments over this one female.  Why not talk to her? Or figure out some positive way of turning these things around?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies if I&#8217;ve offended you in any way.  If you are in fact female then I&#8217;m more shocked than anything that you would find people trying to better the tech environment for other women as destructive.  I guess women work in mysterious ways that I will never understand. </p>
<p>If you were to better the tech community how would you do it?  I think maybe that&#8217;s the question that should be put forward.  Like you I disagree with some of what was written in the guardian.  I&#8217;m not saying that groups for women are right or wrong, or that there aren&#8217;t technical women out there.  You see them all over the industry. And as you rightly say you can be technical and work in web dev etc.  And yes I have mis-represented the tech industry a little by assuming all but meaning .net dev.  Thank you for pointing it out.  I won&#8217;t make the same mistake again! (I think I&#8217;ve been royally told off for that!)</p>
<p>What is it that you see as damaging and what would you want to see that is positive&#8230; From what I can see Sarah has been doing something that builds a community where there wasn&#8217;t one. But maybe I&#8217;m missing something since I&#8217;m a guy. </p>
<p>Also have you let her know that you see what she is doing as destructive?  Have you suggested to her what you think she should be conveying to the general public? Maybe a more adult approach should be taken to this and for someone to tell her what is being talked about in the public domain. I don&#8217;t know her so I don&#8217;t think it would be my place to bring this forward as I don&#8217;t know if you even know one another.  But what about it? Forget public arguments over this one female.  Why not talk to her? Or figure out some positive way of turning these things around?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another geek</title>
		<link>http://fberriman.com/2008/05/23/women-of-the-web/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Another geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fberriman.com/?p=31#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Thanks "Andy."

I don't see any overreactions here. The overreactions are in the initial Guardian article and Sarah Blow's statements and actions. I (and I guess others here) actually really care about the issues and there's a reason these issues are being raised - it's because there are those who believe the things being said and the way they're being said are not only unhelpful but destructive. 

You say don't make gender assumptions, but you explicitly assume I'm a man! My gender actually has no relevance to what I said, by the way.

My assumption that you were Sarah Blow actually had nothing to do with gender - it was based on the points you raised and the style in which you raised them.

You (similarly to Sarah Blow, funnily enough) don't seem to appreciate the web side (or any other sides) of the industry at all. If your/her experience is in the .net world, then, to start (and by that I mean I still believe the points are OTT), relate your points directly to that. Not IT, not technology, not the whole universe.

You're right - we're all entitled to our opinions - and mine (and many others) is that the Guardian article, and many of the fundamental points Sarah Blow is preaching, are doing more harm than good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8220;Andy.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see any overreactions here. The overreactions are in the initial Guardian article and Sarah Blow&#8217;s statements and actions. I (and I guess others here) actually really care about the issues and there&#8217;s a reason these issues are being raised - it&#8217;s because there are those who believe the things being said and the way they&#8217;re being said are not only unhelpful but destructive. </p>
<p>You say don&#8217;t make gender assumptions, but you explicitly assume I&#8217;m a man! My gender actually has no relevance to what I said, by the way.</p>
<p>My assumption that you were Sarah Blow actually had nothing to do with gender - it was based on the points you raised and the style in which you raised them.</p>
<p>You (similarly to Sarah Blow, funnily enough) don&#8217;t seem to appreciate the web side (or any other sides) of the industry at all. If your/her experience is in the .net world, then, to start (and by that I mean I still believe the points are OTT), relate your points directly to that. Not IT, not technology, not the whole universe.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right - we&#8217;re all entitled to our opinions - and mine (and many others) is that the Guardian article, and many of the fundamental points Sarah Blow is preaching, are doing more harm than good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a geek</title>
		<link>http://fberriman.com/2008/05/23/women-of-the-web/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>a geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fberriman.com/?p=31#comment-162</guid>
		<description>OK let me verify what I actually meant by web stuff... how to do web design rather than what technologies are good to use for that sort of thing. Django, php, rails etc yes ok definitely technical.  I see design as a different skill to development.   Maybe that is wrong and maybe it's not, we are all entitled to our own opinion right!  

I think I should have clarified that earlier.  I'm not Sarah, I'm a guy, Andy... I'm 29 and  a .net developer for a large corporate and I'm not going to say more than that!  I would have expected better from other men and I'm actually quite shocked at the assumptions that "another geek" made there! 

I happened to fall across this site when I was looking at some stuff over on Technorati... Who knows how I fell across it but I'm beginning to wish I hadn't got involved in the conversation. 

In terms of action required and what people could do positively to improve things:
- Not over react to points of view.
- Treat people as you expect to be treated yourselves
- Don't make assumptions on gender based on who converses where online.

For those of you interested in other conversations with the C9 guys about women and technology then you might find this forum conversation interesting:
http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261632-Microsoft-not-doing-enough-to-encourge-females/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK let me verify what I actually meant by web stuff&#8230; how to do web design rather than what technologies are good to use for that sort of thing. Django, php, rails etc yes ok definitely technical.  I see design as a different skill to development.   Maybe that is wrong and maybe it&#8217;s not, we are all entitled to our own opinion right!  </p>
<p>I think I should have clarified that earlier.  I&#8217;m not Sarah, I&#8217;m a guy, Andy&#8230; I&#8217;m 29 and  a .net developer for a large corporate and I&#8217;m not going to say more than that!  I would have expected better from other men and I&#8217;m actually quite shocked at the assumptions that &#8220;another geek&#8221; made there! </p>
<p>I happened to fall across this site when I was looking at some stuff over on Technorati&#8230; Who knows how I fell across it but I&#8217;m beginning to wish I hadn&#8217;t got involved in the conversation. </p>
<p>In terms of action required and what people could do positively to improve things:<br />
- Not over react to points of view.<br />
- Treat people as you expect to be treated yourselves<br />
- Don&#8217;t make assumptions on gender based on who converses where online.</p>
<p>For those of you interested in other conversations with the C9 guys about women and technology then you might find this forum conversation interesting:<br />
<a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261632-Microsoft-not-doing-enough-to-encourge-females/" rel="nofollow">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261632-Microsoft-not-doing-enough-to-encourge-females/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Archibald</title>
		<link>http://fberriman.com/2008/05/23/women-of-the-web/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Archibald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fberriman.com/?p=31#comment-159</guid>
		<description>@a geek:

I like how you're saying that men dismiss women in the industry and this is awful.

Then you say "web stuff" isn't technical.

I did a JavaScript presentation at barcamp.
I also attended presentations on IE bugs (hosted by a female), Google app engine (building an app using it &#38; django), code reviewing, and html5 (hosted by a female).

These are technical and "web stuff".

Your hypocrisy astounds me. If you're wanting to rid the world of ignorance, arrogance, stereotyping &#38; snap judgements... I'd start closer to home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@a geek:</p>
<p>I like how you&#8217;re saying that men dismiss women in the industry and this is awful.</p>
<p>Then you say &#8220;web stuff&#8221; isn&#8217;t technical.</p>
<p>I did a JavaScript presentation at barcamp.<br />
I also attended presentations on IE bugs (hosted by a female), Google app engine (building an app using it &amp; django), code reviewing, and html5 (hosted by a female).</p>
<p>These are technical and &#8220;web stuff&#8221;.</p>
<p>Your hypocrisy astounds me. If you&#8217;re wanting to rid the world of ignorance, arrogance, stereotyping &amp; snap judgements&#8230; I&#8217;d start closer to home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
